Of commodities in short supply these days, cynicism is least among them. Employees are full of it, even more so, voters -- your average stiffs who show up at polling booths wanting to believe the future will somehow be better than, or at least different from, the present.
Yet, and still, doubtful as ever, they cast their ballots with a shrug and shuffle away.
But consider now the recent legislative session, a place of winners and losers, as always, but one also in which good triumphed not once but twice for Minnesota and its residents, seemingly against odds.
In the process, cynicism was beaten back, at least a bit.
At issue fundamentally was the fate of a proposed constitutional amendment to dedicate a portion of the state sales tax to intensified conservation.
Following a tortuous, 10-year path, this idea -- sound and necessary -- seemed perpetually snakebit. Most knowledgeable observers agree Minnesota is fast dissolving into itself, maintaining its historic boundaries while vacating its most valued assets-- clean lakes and rivers, wetlands, prairies, forests.
Yet since statehood, the Legislature has failed to defend these resources in meaningful ways.
Such inaction is counterintuitive, because the health of our land and water and the futures of Minnesota and Minnesotans are linked. Fragmented forests, polluted lakes and wildlife losses weigh on our collective psyche; bum us out in ways obvious and not.