Minnesota taxpayers, particularly families, senior citizens and those who work from home, could see $24 million in overall tax relief under Gov. Mark Dayton's recent budget proposal, a more precisely crafted plan compared with past budget blueprints.
Because the proposals are tilted more heavily toward tax relief, they already have found some favor among the Republicans who control the House — a stark contrast from the heated battles sparked by the DFL governor's earlier proposals for tax hikes for the rich and business interests.
The costliest item, a $100 million expansion of the child care tax credit, has received some bipartisan support, though Republicans may move to reduce eligibility. Other pieces constitute a series of tweaks aimed at closing loopholes and leveling the playing field for Minnesota taxpayers.
"In going through the governor's bill, it was more modest than it has been in the past," said Rep. Greg Davids, R-Preston, and chairman of the House Taxes Committee. "There are some things we're going to agree on."
One proposed change would allow more senior citizens to defer their property taxes. Another would close a handful of corporate tax loopholes to nip growing tax-evasion techniques. Dayton would put an end to double-dipping Wisconsinites who work in Minnesota but claim a working family tax credit in both states — a change that officials estimate would save the state about $10 million over the next two years.
'Closing loopholes'
"Many of the provisions are really aimed at fairness, using the most up-to-date methodology for assessing values or closing loopholes or treating people the same across Minnesota," Revenue Commissioner Cynthia Bauerly said.
For some Minnesota companies, the changes would close loopholes that have allowed them to skimp on taxes. It would expand the definition of financial institutions to include partnerships and limited liability corporations. Some insurance companies that shelter income from Minnesota taxes are also being targeted. Closing the loopholes would raise $17.4 million over the next two years.
Roughly 100 seniors are expected to benefit if the state reduces the residency requirement for a property-tax deferral from 15 years to five. It would be a lifeline for a growing number of empty nesters who often downsize to smaller homes during retirement, Bauerly said.