Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
The Sept. 7 article “Vision for Roof Depot gets a reprieve” missed important points about this proposal for an indoor urban farm, for which the Minneapolis City Council approved a one-year funding deadline extension.
The Roof Depot property is a 230,000-square-foot warehouse and a half-block-long parking lot adjacent to the city’s Hiawatha Yards, home to street repair, sewer and stormwater maintenance, and water system maintenance shops. The city bought the Roof Depot property as expansion for the crowded Hiawatha Yards in 2016.
A community group, called the East Phillips Neighborhood Institute (EPNI) and led by Dean Dovolis, opposed the expansion. Instead, the group proposed to buy the Roof Depot property. Today, its website (epnifarm.org/vision) says plans for it include an indoor fish farm, affordable housing, a solar farm on the roof, a jobs and skills training center, a youth development center, community gathering spaces, a community kitchen, retail space, space for homeless people, and a creative arts studio.
The city agreed in 2023 to sell the Roof Depot to EPNI for $11.4 million. To pay for it, EPNI received $2 million from the Minnesota Legislature in 2023 and was to receive another $5.7 million in 2024 if EPNI raised the remaining $3.7 million from private sources by August. EPNI got a loan for the $3.7 million but too late to secure the $5.7 million. Instead of moving on, the city extended the deadline for this deal another year, giving EPNI even more time to raise the $5.7 million from other sources, including possibly city money (see tinyurl.com/rd-terms).
This delay is not free. So far, the city has spent more than $18.7 million on this project (see tinyurl.com/rd-fiscal). It currently costs the city $100,000 a month to carry the property (according to an email from Barbara O’Brien from the city of Minneapolis to Council Member Linea Palmisano). A one-year delay means the city will spend another $1.2 million on this project minimum. Funds are coming from the Water Fund. The sale would generate $11.5 million, plus the state provided $4.5 million, leaving a deficit in the Water Fund of $3.9 million that presumably would be paid from water fees. It is highly unusual to use water revenues for development projects, and this may violate the city charter.
EPNI has proposed that one-third ownership would be by East Phillips residents with an income of 30% or less of the region’s median income. One-third would be tenants, who presumably would become owners simply by renting, and one-third would be outside investors. This model has never been used, and it is not clear if it could be legally implemented.