Body armor and the threat of gun violence to urban children were hot topics in the Legislature's continuing discussion of gun violence on Thursday.
A bill proposed by Rep. Erik Simonson, DFL-Duluth, would limit civilian ownership of bulletproof vests and other items of body armor to those obtaining permits from their chief of police. Simonson said he is concerned that people who perpetrate mass shootings and other criminal acts are wearing body armor.
He said making it harder to obtain these items could prevent such a tragedy.
"We must consider the value of prevention," he said.
A supporter of the idea, Rep. Dan Schoen, DFL-St.Paul Park, who is a police officer, said finding such equipment in a home or car "sends a shiver up and down your spine."
But opponents, including the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, who have been filling committee rooms with sympathetic members this week, said the armor is used for defensive reasons only and should not be prohibited for civilian use.
Andrew Rothman, vice president of the civil rights alliance, denied Simonson's claims that shooters in Auroa, Colo., and Newtown, Connecticut, were wearing body armor. He said he was "appalled" by the idea that police and military could wear the vests but citizens could not.
Joe Olson, president of the civil rights alliance, said he keeps his vest and handgun by his bedside, and puts on the vest and picks up the weapon "when things go bang in the night. I put the vest on, pick up the gun, and go investigate," he said.