What if Minnesota counties built jails and the inmates didn't come? That's the predicament facing dozens of Minnesota counties.
From one perspective, it's a good thing that jail populations dropped: less crime and fewer inmates to support with tax dollars.
But there's a downside, too. Minnesota is littered with thousands of empty cells after counties overbuilt jails.
In Houston County, for example, officials are close to completing a new jail, but they have so few prisoners that they are questioning whether to open it. Letting the facility empty at least would save the money it would cost to staff it.
Sheriffs and county commissioners facing this same problem owe the public an explanation. And it's time they revealed their game plans for dealing with the new reality of surplus cells.
Among the solutions: working together regionally to use facilities efficiently and shutting down portions of them if necessary. At the same time, counties must be nimble enough to respond and open up capacity if inmate numbers rise again.
Counties landed in this situation because dozens of them either built new jails, expanded old ones or both in recent years. (Since 2003, the number of jail beds has jumped by nearly 2,000.)
Those decisions were made in the 1990s and early 2000s based on then-growing inmate populations and crime trends.