A national watchdog group says Wisconsin bear hunters are harassing wolves with their dog packs — then claiming state compensation when their hounds are killed — and wants the federal government to launch a criminal investigation.
The practice amounts to "a state-sanctioned financial subsidy for hunters engaged in the criminal harassment" of wolves, an attorney for Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) said in a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
In 2016, Wisconsin paid out $99,400 for 41 dogs, a maximum of $2,500 each. The dogs were killed primarily in July and August, when hunters are in the woods training their packs to chase bears and wolf pups are first emerging from their dens. More than a dozen dogs were killed, despite "caution" warnings by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that wolf packs with pups were active in the area, PEER said.
"It is harassment of an endangered species, committed by a relatively small number of hunters," said Adam Carlesco, staff counsel for PEER. He said Wisconsin is the only state that reimburses dog owners in addition to farmers and livestock owners for wolf depredation.
The president of the Wisconsin Bear Hunters' Association called PEER's allegations "absurd" and said that most hunters try to avoid wolves, even as their population expands.
"[PEER] has no idea what it costs to raise feed and maintain a good hunting dog," said Carl Schoettel. The state's financial compensation "is a fraction of what the loss is, plus the emotional cost to your children's hunting dogs and yours also."
Officials from the Fish and Wildlife Service said that they received the letter but that they haven't decided how to respond.
PEER's action has intensified the long-running conflict between wolf advocates and some in the Wisconsin hunting community about the use of dogs to pursue prey. Wisconsin was the only state that allowed the use of dogs to hunt wolves when they were temporarily removed from federal threatened species protection between 2012 and 2014 — a practice widely criticized by wildlife advocates but eventually upheld by a state court.