The confirmation process is broken

Los Angeles Times
January 30, 2013 at 8:18PM
Richard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that he will re-nominate Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a role that he has held for the last year under a recess appointment, and nominate Mary Joe White to lead the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Richard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that he will re-nominate Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a role that he has held for the last year under a recess appointment. (Associated Press - Ap/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

In a breathtakingly broad decision, a federal appeals court has ruled that President Obama violated the Constitution when he unilaterally appointed three members of the National Labor Relations Board during a "pro forma" session of the Senate.

If upheld by the Supreme Court, the decision would all but end so-called recess appointments, by which presidents of both parties have bypassed the Senate -- often because of unjustified obstruction by a determined minority.

Reining in the president's ability to make recess appointments wouldn't be a problem if the confirmation process worked the way the framers intended. But in Washington's current partisan gridlock, a minority of senators can -- and too often do -- deny a president a timely up-or-down vote on his nominations, a distortion of the advice-and-consent process.

about the writer

about the writer

EDITORIAL

More from Commentaries

See More
card image
Carlos Gonzalez/The Minnesota Star Tribune

It seems like we’re now heading in the right direction under the leadership of White House border czar Tom Homan.

Opinion | What happens after our shock fades?

card image
card image