METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Elected board is best, as Portland demonstrates
I applaud the Star Tribune Editorial Board for supporting land-use planning that would reduce sprawl ("Decentralization dulls metro's edge," Feb. 8). As you state, this task is the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council. But it is not true, as you also claim, that the Met Council has been "powerless to stop the steady and destructive decentralization of the metro region."
As Myron Orfield, professor in the University of Minnesota Law School, has shown, Minnesota's Metropolitan Council has more statutory authority, more power, to limit sprawl than any other metropolitan planning organization in the country. This includes Portland's regional planning organization, the Metro. Yet Portland has contained sprawl. Why have we lagged behind?
According to Orfield, one reason is that members to our Met Council are appointed by the governor. The council's makeup changes radically each time the governorship changes parties. By contrast, the Metro is more stable because it is an elected body. Its philosophy changes only gradually over time. Those concerned about sprawl in our metro area should support an elected Met Council.
ARTHUR E. WALZER, ST. PAUL
HELLO, GOP?
Focus on economy, or 'G' will mean gridlock
As someone who has voted many times for Republican candidates, I'm finding that they appear out of touch and are standing on the sidelines in the current economic state we find ourselves in.
I'm going to school to retrain myself in a different occupation, and my COBRA health insurance and unemployment are due to run out this summer -- I don't need someone to continually remind me we've lost millions of jobs and to sit on the sidelines and simply criticize and block every attempt by the current administration to get things moving.
The gridlock is inexcusable. For the first time ever, I am seriously considering independent candidates in the future. The Republican Party has lost me!
MICHAEL KRIEG, BURNSVILLE