Why the ‘barrage of headlines’ on clergy abuse? Because it’s news.
If it’s a target, there’s a pretty good reason
The “barrage of headlines” Katherine Kersten bemoans in her May 28 commentary (“Clergy sex abuse is serious, but church is a target, too”) is driven by two facts: There has been plenty of news to report, and people are interested in reading about it. Kersten throws sand in her readers’ eyes by pointing out that pedophilia is not exclusive to the Catholic Church. True enough. But by setting itself up as the final authority on morality while simultaneously covering up serious crimes, the church has made itself a ripe target.
Its teachings on “abortion, contraception, premarital chastity and same-sex marriage” are all, at their core, about controlling sexual behavior. But if the pedophile priest scandal teaches us anything (and it should teach us a lot of things), it is that human sexuality cannot be easily contained. The actions of many obviously noncelibate priests make this clear.
The church wants us to believe that the only acceptable expression of sexuality is for procreation within marriage. This is dangerous nonsense. Unattainable standards are harmful because they make good people feel badly about themselves when they “fail.” Then their natural desires tend to come out sideways.
Instead of getting defensive and pushing back against journalists and lawyers, Kersten might consider that they are doing her and all devout Catholics a service by helping to root out a cancer that eats away at the body of Christ.
Karl Glotzbach, St. Louis Park
• • •
Leave it to Kersten to spin the tragedy of clerical abuse into a right-wing conspiracy theory. Her not-so-subtle implication that the DFL Party is trying to dismantle the last remaining bastion of conservatism in Minnesota through this litigation is flawed in two ways: 1) It’s hinged on a financial connection between Jeff Anderson and the DFL that is not nearly as sinister as Kersten is portraying it to be, and 2) Kersten implies that the Catholic Church is representative of her own political orientation. The church is bigger than that. It has its own unique set of ethical and social mores that transcend party lines. Far be it from me to claim the church for progressivism, but perhaps Kersten ought to read Evangelii Gaudium, the Holy Father’s “manifesto,” of sorts, touching on the perils of unregulated capitalism and social inequality.
In short, Kersten’s argument that the DFL is trying to dismantle the church (a metonym for conservatism in her mind) relies on a tenuous connection between an attorney who goes after pedophiles for a living and the public record of his political contributions. In addition, she flattens the church’s unique ethical and social positions by claiming, in so many words, that they represent her political beliefs and not those of others.
Logan McMillen, Edina
• • •
Thank you to Kersten for stating my thoughts so clearly. When the Legislature lifted the statute of limitations in 2013, I knew what would happen.
I thank God continually for my Catholic faith and all the graces he gives me. I thank God for all the holy clergy in my life, past and current. I pray daily for all who think they can ignore the Ten Commandments, that they will come to know the love of God and start to live moral lives.
Mary Lou Monighan, Plymouth
Oh, so stadiums are cool but not hospitals?
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.