The U.S. has long since ceded the moral high ground on global affairs.
The United States is short on credibility
Would we tolerate civil disobedience over an unfavorable trade pact, leading to government buildings being stormed and destroyed, to our people being in danger and to our president being forced to flee? Of course not; we would arrest, try and imprison such protesters. They would be considered anarchists. So why do we hail the same type of people in Ukraine as patriots?
I am a very proud American, but can you see why the world looks at us with contempt.
ED STEC, Maple Grove
• • •
Unfortunately, the United States has lost any moral high ground it may once have had to criticize Russia’s invasion and occupation of the Crimean region of Ukraine. Our invasion and 10-year occupation of Iraq, a country that posed no threat to us, makes any such criticism ring false and hollow, and the world knows it.
STEPHEN KRIZ, Maple Grove
• • •
It is stunning the way our elected officials show so little regard to the condition of our country but seem to be on warp speed when things happen in other countries.
The upheaval in Ukraine has prompted pledges of billions of our dollars to stabilize that country’s economic situation, while here we can’t seem to find the money for voting machines. Our children go to bed hungry; we deny unemployment insurance to laid-off workers who watched their jobs go offshore, and our politicians fall over themselves to be the first to stand against our president. We, instead, wonder when are they going to stand against the people who have no problem with the condition of our infrastructure and schools but who gleefully send our tax dollars to back wars that we don’t want to be involved in.
JAMES HUDSON, Minneapolis
The suburbs aren’t a welcoming place
The Star Tribune Editorial Board (March 4) puts its weight behind a seriously flawed analysis of affordable housing policy by University of Minnesota law Prof. Myron Orfield.
Orfield has a theory. He believes that the concentration of poverty is at least partly caused by affordable-housing development policy. Those of us who actually build affordable housing know that the housing follows the poverty, not the other way around.
While I agree that affordable housing should be dispersed throughout the region, suburbs in their present form do not provide public infrastructure or public opinion conducive to lives lived on a low or moderate income. Providing housing without bus service or a nearby grocery store to a family with no car is a fool’s errand. Families of color are not going to give up their community to go live in isolation among people who consider them to be a blighting influence. Until suburbs evolve further away from their origins as exclusively white, car-oriented enclaves, shifting our affordable housing policy in that direction will be a disservice to the people we claim to serve.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.