Readers Write: (Aug. 21): U health care, sex offenders, Southwest light rail, national security

  • Updated: August 20, 2013 - 6:30 PM

Illustration: Mailbox.

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


No one benefits from a race to the bottom

As a longtime employee of the University of Minnesota, I found the Aug. 17 editorial (“U health benefits will still be enviable”) too much to take. The Star Tribune has eagerly joined the corporate bandwagon in a race to the economic bottom for workers, dripping with disdain and misrepresentation. Thanks a lot!

It’s one thing to opine that U employees should perhaps pay a bit more for their health insurance. But the supposition that it’s unhealthy for us to have it (supposedly) so much better than the private sector, along with the implication that lower-paid employees must have benefit cuts to make up for administrative bloat, is inaccurate, and an insult.

We don’t have it better. Most ­private-sector positions offer higher salaries. You’ve surely heard that many union workers settle for lower salaries in exchange for good benefits.

I also believe that the private sector offers much more opportunity for advancement and career movement, along with less-insulated and fairer managers.


• • •

It’s not surprising that most of the “Cadillac plans” for health care are held by unionized workers. People fought and died for these benefits. The Obamacare tax on these plans is an attempt to drive a wedge between unionized and nonunionized workers.

Yes, the U’s insurance plan is better than what many people have. This is especially true in Greater Minnesota, where access to quality care and affordable full-coverage insurance is limited. But U employees paying more will not result in others paying less. It only results in a race to the bottom.

Increasing office copays punishes those who have chronic conditions and need regular care. Care will be delayed, resulting in more costly hospitalizations later. This is already happening for millions of working people. (See the July 16 Star Tribune story “Men tend to put off health care when it costs more, U study says.”)

The university has money for sports stadiums and executive salaries. Its president makes $610,000 a year — more than the president of the United States. Instead of taking more from students in tuition and fees, and more from workers who struggle to make ends meet, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) says it’s time for the university’s administration to put staff and students first. Our fight is a fight for all working people.

SANDRA SHERMAN, St. Anthony Village

• • •



It doesn’t help to evoke hysteria with headlines

The top-of-the-front-page Aug. 20 headline announcing that two sex offenders “may go free” was such a distortion that it deserves a response. Anyone being considered for release from the Minnesota Sex Offenders Program has received years of treatment and will continue to receive a high level of scrutiny in the community, most likely to include some combination of supervised living, employment, and electronic supervision such as wearing an ankle bracelet. The headline made it sound as if these men are like helium balloons being let go at the State Fair. The article explains that the program is under federal review, and that it is likely we will be forced to release hundreds of these men under much less controlled circumstances if we fail to act responsibly now.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters