Readers Write: (July 11): Minnesota Orchestra, wolf hunting, food assistance, gun liability

  • Updated: July 10, 2013 - 6:44 PM

Illustration: Mailbox.

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


Re-form as cooperative, discard management

A modest proposal: Let the Minnesota Orchestra management go on as it likes, with no orchestra to play for it. Perhaps it can be happy to just manage Orchestra Hall. Meanwhile, the actual orchestra should reincorporate as the Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra as a cooperative of the musicians. Preferably, all the funds of the Minnesota Orchestra would be transferred to the new organization, which would then be free to choose its own management.

The American Symphony Orchestra was incorporated as a cooperative, as I recall. I have great memories of attending MSO concerts at Northrop Auditorium, and I consider that preferable to Orchestra Hall. The truth is, Orchestra Hall’s acoustics have never been that good. There is too much reverberation, and that is not suitable for deep listening. A concert hall should not sound like a stereo recording. The goal should be clarity and balance, not echo. The bright sounds of brass and percussion should never bounce off the walls.

Additionally, there is a St. Paul orchestra that deserves equal recognition, so it is not really suitable to use a statewide name.

SAUL DAVIS, Philadelphia and Minneapolis

• • •



Opponents’ voices must be heard

Special-interest groups (hunters, trappers, ranchers) lobbied the Legislature for a wolf hunt as soon as the wolf was removed from the endangered species list (“Wolf hunting season to return,” July 10). The 2012 Legislature narrowly passed the wolf hunt bill. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources then rushed to implement the trophy hunting of wolves. The majority of Minnesotans, who don’t hunt or trap, had no opportunity to be heard.

This is the time for us to speak. The wolf hunt is bad policy, is undemocratic and needs to be stopped. The precipitous drop in the wolf population demonstrates that we don’t know what we are doing.


• • •

Evidently the quoted opponents of Minnesota’s wolf-hunting season have been drawn into the numbers game of “sustainable harvest” quotas. But that is not the issue that moves most informed Minnesotans and others around the world to decry killing wolves for sport and for their fur. The suffering of those injured and not immediately killed, and the social and emotional disruption of pack relationships that can weaken the strength of the pack and hunting success, cannot be discounted. Nor can the ecological value of high wolf numbers to balance coyote numbers, which can reduce red fox numbers shown in some studies to be significant in controlling Lyme and other tick-borne disease-carrying rodents.

The Star Tribune’s July 10 article notes that the DNR depopulated whitetail deer excessively in some areas. This certainly meant some wolves starved to death, were ravaged by mange or turned to killing livestock. The juggernaut of DNR-managed exploitation of wildlife must be stopped and a science-based approach to ecologically sound, biodiversity-enhancing and compassionate conservation policies and practices adopted.

MICHAEL W. FOX, Minneapolis

• • •

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters