Continued: A blogger's quest: Where's the database?

The e-mail to the editorial writer had a catchy grabber of a greeting: "Dear Fellow Tax Slave,'' wrote Todd Kruse, a 42-year-old Apple Valley man who blogs and runs a small public affairs/executive search firm.

A frequent critic of wasteful government spending, Kruse had a good question about a good idea: a searchable online database allowing taxpayers to track where state money is spent. The Minnesota Legislature approved such a database in 2007. Kruse thought it was supposed to be up and running by this summer.

So where is it?

The answer isn't what he wanted to hear: There isn't one. He's still waiting for a good answer to another question: Why not?

Kruse's quest led to e-mail exchanges with lawmakers, bureaucrats, tax activists and finally, the media. Calls from both Kruse and the editorial writer only muddied the waters. Kruse initially was told the database didn't exist. But then a legislative aide said it did. The aide sent a link. Once it actually worked, it was quickly apparent this was not the right database. "From what I saw on this website this is simply a tool for the 'takings coalition' to find state money to apply for it is NOT a tool for taxpayers to see 'where does our money go.' What do you think?'' e-mailed a frustrated Kruse.

The well-intentioned aide was indeed mistaken. Several phone calls later, the state Department of Administration confirmed Kruse's fears. There is no database, and it's not clear when there will be. An old state computer system, which is being updated, is not Internet-friendly. It's not clear if the new computer system will include a spending database because the Legislature didn't appropriate the $1 million to $1.5 million needed for it.

Back in Apple Valley, Kruse is rightly disappointed. The Internet offers taxpaying voters an unprecedented opportunity to hold government accountable for its spending. The federal government has a database similar to the one planned in Minnesota. Several states have quickly put up so-called "Google Government" databases. The pricetag in Texas? $310,000. "So Minnesota needs at least $1 million dollars but the State of Texas did essentially the same thing for only $310,000?'' Kruse wrote in his blog. "Something is clearly wrong here and further justifies the need for spending transparency in government.''

Kruse's database crusade is a worthy one. Legislators and bureaucrats, take heed. Minnesota should be leading the way-- not dragging its feet -- when it comes to government accountability.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Time to review state forfeiture laws - May 15, 2008

Editorial: Time to review state forfeiture laws - Improvements are needed after Gang Strike Force debacle. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS