Dear Ms. Windsor:
Fifty years ago you walked into a restaurant in New York City that, on Friday nights, was known to cater to women who wanted to meet other women. You would meet Thea Spyer, the woman who would eventually become your wife, that night. Five decades later, the two of you have walked into history with the potentially landmark case, United States v. Windsor, that you have brought to the Supreme Court.
Since 1996, and the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the U.S. has legally defined marriage as the “union between one man and one woman.” In the eyes of our federal government, your 44-year relationship with Ms. Spyer, which included a 40-year engagement and a wedding, in 2007 in Canada, was not as legitimate as heterosexual marriages. This despite the fact that you both worked, paid taxes, contributed to the community and you cared for your spouse throughout her long struggle with multiple sclerosis until her death in 2009. Eventually, New York State would recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries where such unions were legal, but because of DOMA, the federal government did not.
When Thea died, you were left to pay $363,000 in federal estate taxes that you would not have had to do if, as you have said in the past, “Thea was Theo.” You had had enough, and you brought your case to the Supreme Court. Now the case has been heard and we will wait until this summer to learn if the highest court in the land will end this discriminatory law that has harmed so many Americans.
Ms. Windsor, you have said that DOMA is “…a terrible injustice, and I don’t expect that from my country.” And that’s an important point that is too often left out of this discussion. This is our country, too, and it is long past time that all of the rights and benefits afforded heterosexual, married couples are extended to same-sex, married couples.
A few years after you and Ms. Spyer met, a new musical, Cabaret, opened on Broadway. I wonder if the two of you went to see the production. If so, you would have heard the song, “Married,” that includes the lyric:
“How the world can change,
It can change like that.
Due to one little word: Married.”
Our worlds change all of the time.
We go to a restaurant and we meet the person we will spend the rest of our lives with. And, a few courageous people like you share your story with the world, take your case before the Supreme Court and, hopefully, help to change the definition of one little word, “marriage.”
More from Star Tribune
More from Kevin Winge
Mayor Rybak takes his "Marry Me in Minneapolis" campaign on the road.
The Supreme Court recognized the rights of married same-sex couples and the world didn't come to an end.
The President of Exodus International, Alan Chambers, apologizes to the gay community for the attempts to "cure" gays and lesbians of homosexuality and closes the ministry.
Attendees at the Southern Baptist Convention's annual meeting this week should listen to the lyrics of Macklemore + Lewis' hip-hop song, "Same Love," before voting to disassociate themselves from the Boy Scouts of America.
Coca-Cola's new media campaign to beat obesity is like the tobacco industry launching an anti-cancer campaign.
Recommended For You
Dr. Penny Wheeler has built a sterling reputation as a collaborator and innovator. Now nurses say they feel betrayed.
Down 10-0 in the first quarter, the Vikings woke up in the second half thanks to a Marcus Sherels punt return for a score and finished with eight sacks on Cam Newton.
From punts to returns, the Vikings displayed it all on Sunday.
Trump's reference to Bill Clinton affair underscores his own history of infidelity
Crews with a bulldozer punched a hole in the building before court order stopped demolition.
Recommended For You
Readers Write (Aug. 17): Ilhan Omar, candidate disclosures, race and crime, GMOs, health care access and costs
Sorry — scrutiny comes with the territory.
A federal judge weighing whether to block a new Indiana law banning abortions sought because of a fetus' genetic abnormalities sounded skeptical of the measure during a Tuesday hearing, saying it may infringe on some women's right to an abortion.
In biology, sociology, even psychology, sex and gender are different things. But the law may think them one and the same.
It would be a logical extension of the right to same-sex marriage.
In a historic day for gay rights, the Supreme Court gave the nation's legally married gay couples equal federal footing with all other married Americans on Wednesday and also cleared the way for same-sex marriages to resume in California.