Commentary
Legislation working its way through the Legislature would weaken some key parts of Minnesota's landmark Next Generation Energy Act, a law that enjoyed broad bipartisan support when it was signed in 2007.
In a nutshell, the law sets renewable-energy goals for Minnesota utilities, with the ultimate objective of getting 25 percent of our electricity from renewable sources by 2025.
According to the state Office of Energy Security, Minnesota's electrical utilities are on track to meet the goals, in spite of the serious economic challenges of the past two years.
Now, some in St. Paul are suggesting that the state turn back to the fuel source that has kept the lights on for more than a century -- coal.
Minnesota already generates roughly 60 percent of its electricity by burning coal, which must be purchased from other states. The state has no coal, oil or natural-gas resources.
This can be seen as a blessing or a curse. Fossil-fuel interests do not wield the political clout here that they have in other states, leaving Minnesota free to become a national leader in clean energy and to pass forward-thinking laws like the Next Generation Energy Act.
While coal's supporters often speak of its lower price tag relative to other fuels, they rarely acknowledge the hidden health costs of burning coal. Burning coal releases at least 84 known hazardous pollutants into the air we breathe, including ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides.