The mug shot is the star of the voyeur's internet.
Any web search turns up thousands of images of people booked and photographed by police, many of them identified by name and searchable by your city, or in categories: the most grotesque, absurd, famous, attractive, pathetic.
Guilty or innocent, your mug shot lives on. Some private websites charge large fees to take down the images.
It's depressing, but the alternative — making all mug shots secret — is worse.
In the view of a federal appeals court in Ohio, public access to mug shots is out of control. On July 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled 9-7 that federal booking photos are no longer public records. The decision reversed its own 1996 ruling and recognized that the world has changed since then.
"Mugshots now present an acute problem in the digital age: these images preserve the indignity of a deprivation of liberty, often at the [literal] expense of the most vulnerable among us," Chief Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. wrote in a concurring opinion. "Look no further than the mugshot-extortion business."
In a dissent, Judge Danny J. Boggs says the majority opinion sacrifices transparency for a dubious benefit.
"Today's decision obscures our government's most coercive functions — the powers to detain and accuse — and returns them to the shadows," Boggs wrote. "Open government is too dear a cost to pay for the mirage of privacy that the majority has to offer."