•••
The talking heads constantly ask Ukraine to negotiate a peace with Russia right away. Perhaps we should ask a different question. If a stronger, bigger enemy attacked the U.S., which states would you abandon to the invader to buy peace? Which states are not worth defending? Which of our fellow citizens should we leave behind for that invader to imprison, torture or kill? It is only fair that we should have to answer the same questions that we expect the Ukrainians to answer.
Phyllis Ballata, White Bear Lake
•••
The Harris-Walz campaign has been reaching out to Polish American voters, reminding them that the country of their ancestors is once again at risk of invasion. Russian President Vladimir Putin might well do to Poland what he has done to Ukraine. For most of the 20th century, Russia was a major aggressor in Europe and Central Asia. After World War II ended, Russia, under the flag of the Soviet Union, occupied and/or dominated virtually all Eastern European countries and several Central European countries, along with several Central Asian countries. Putin has said that the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century. He seems eager to restore Russian dominance in the countries that were Soviet satellites during the Cold War. In today’s Europe, after conquering Ukraine, he would likely stir up troubles on the Ukraine-Poland border and use that as a pretext to invade Poland. The Harris-Walz campaign is wise to remind Polish Americans of that threat.
I can understand how Polish Americans might feel about seeing the homeland of their ancestors invaded and occupied by Russia. Many Polish Americans maintain strong connections to their ancestral home. The thought of it coming once again under Russian dominance is repugnant to them. Interestingly, all four of my grandparents emigrated to the U.S. from three countries (Finland, Sweden and Ukraine) that are all too familiar with Russian threats to their freedom and sovereignty. Finland and Sweden only became members of NATO after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Putin’s full-scale invasion shattered a longstanding sense of stability in northern Europe, leaving Sweden and Finland feeling vulnerable. Both countries had previously been neutral and did not join NATO when it was formed in 1949. Meanwhile, Ukraine has wanted to join NATO ever since the Cold War ended.
Like Polish Americans who feel a kinship with the country of their ancestors, I also feel a kinship with Finland, Sweden and Ukraine because of my own heritage. I would hate to see those countries become vassal states of Russia. A second Trump administration would opt out of NATO, abandon Europe and (according to Trump) let Putin “do whatever the hell he wants” to NATO members that do not increase their defense spending. His comments have shocked and worried European allies and demonstrated that a future Trump presidency could lead to a weakened NATO. A Harris-Walz administration would ensure that the U.S. remains in NATO and that European nations remain strong allies of the U.S.