(Note: This analysis of the close of the 2016 session comes from Morning Hot Dish, our daily political newsletter. If you'd like to subscribe to the free newsletter, sign up for it at the StarTribune.com member center.)
It's 1:30 a.m. as I write, 90 minutes after a spectacular failure on the part of the Legislature, as a $1 billion bonding package that also had $265 million cash for roads and bridges passed the House, though amid a lot of rancorous shouting, with minutes to spare. It passed the Senate but with an amendment to raise the debt limit for Hennepin County (or Met Council — wasn't totally clear), which would have allowed locals the ability to raise the money to do Southwest Light Rail. But by then it was midnight and the House had adjourned. Poof.
Majority Leader Tom Bakk and House Speaker Kurt Daudt each blamed the other, saying they broke promises.
On the one hand: They have no one to blame but themselves. They had 11 weeks to get it done and wound up passing spending and tax cuts and then trying to do bonding all on the final day. Hundreds of pages of legislation, nearly $2 billion total if you add up the tax cuts, spending and borrowing, all in the final hours. Even if they had given themselves a couple more hours, presumably they could have worked it out. It's like a team that starts blaming each other after losing to a sorry opponent.
On the other hand, it's also quite possible they could never get to a deal because Daudt could not give anything on metro transit, and Bakk could not whip the votes without it. The conflict was insoluble.
So, for now, the incumbents go home without big bonding and road projects and quickly do whatever they can to blame the other side.
It's doubtful the public will actually take a fine toothed comb to determine who was really at fault. It's like your kids fighting about who started it.
But if it's true the public doesn't care about process, they do notice when important projects don't get funded. So this is probably bad for all incumbents.