The fairness or unfairness of Amy Senser's 41-month sentence is likely to be debated for a while, but it's easy to agree there was little ordinary about this hit-and-run case. Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Deborah Russell said it was "one of the most difficult cases to prosecute" in her almost 20-year career, due to constant media coverage, a voracious public appetite and no eyewitness accounts.
I doubt Russell is the only person relieved that it's over.
Before this unforgettable trial becomes yesterday's news, a few observations:
While prosecutors are pleased that justice was served, the fact remains that class and race issues still lurk just below the surface.
From the moment this story broke nearly 11 months ago, raw frustration sprang from readers of color, as well as the less affluent, certain that they would quickly have been looking at the inside of a jail cell had they been the driver. Senser, married to former Viking and restaurant owner Joe Senser, remained free until Monday's sentencing on two felony counts of criminal vehicular homicide.
While Russell confidently said Judge Daniel Mabley treated Senser "just like anyone else who had come before him," not all are buying it as a general rule. As much progress as we've made to create a color- and connections-blind criminal justice system, we still have work to do to change perceptions and, perhaps, policies.
Our collective emotional investment in this trial was peculiar at best, troubling at worst. Not everybody exhibited schadenfreude, delight in another's misfortune. But most of us exhibited ownership, talking about the case, speculating, judging.
Star Tribune digital media editor Terry Sauer said the guilty verdict for Senser, announced May 3, created "probably the largest crush of Web audience over a 30-minute period since Brett Favre was being driven from the airport to Winter Park after he signed a couple of years ago."