Advertisement

DNA is a key tool in Innocence Project's mission

August 1, 2015 at 9:40PM

For more than two decades, the Innocence Project has used DNA evidence to free the wrongfully convicted.

DNA is the "gold standard" for going back into old cases to prove where things went wrong, said Paul Cates, spokesman for the New York-based Innocence Project. "DNA exposes the cracks in the system in a way it hadn't been exposed before."

Since 1989, 330 people have been released from prison after DNA evidence showed they weren't connected to the crime. The Innocence Project has worked on 176 of those cases.

"To the best of our knowledge, those people are innocent," Cates said.

At a glance:

• The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989.

• Of 330 people who've been exonerated through DNA, 20 served time on death row. Another 16 were charged with capital crimes but not sentenced to death.

• Thirty-one of those exonerated pleaded guilty to crimes they didn't commit.

Advertisement
Advertisement

• Leading causes of wrongful convictions: eyewitness misidentification, invalidated or improper forensic science, false confessions and incriminating statements and informants who lie.

• More than 3,000 people write to the Innocence Project every year in search of help.

• The Innocence Project works on 250 to 300 cases at any given time.

• In about half the cases, DNA confirms the person's guilt.

• The length of time it's taken to win an exoneration has ranged from one year to 14 years.

• About 60 percent of those who were exonerated received compensation through state laws or civil lawsuits. For those compensated under state laws, the median compensation is $24,000 per year of time served.

Advertisement

For more information, go to the Innocence Project atinnocenceproject.org.

Advertisement
about the writer

about the writer

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
In this photo taken Monday, March 6, 2017, in San Francisco, released confidential files by The University of California of a sexual misconduct case, like this one against UC Santa Cruz Latin Studies professor Hector Perla is shown. Perla was accused of raping a student during a wine-tasting outing in June 2015. Some of the files are so heavily redacted that on many pages no words are visible. Perla is one of 113 UC employees found to have violated the system's sexual misconduct policies in rece

We respect the desire of some tipsters to remain anonymous, and have put in place ways to contact reporters and editors to ensure the communication will be private and secure.

Advertisement
Advertisement