Olson: Whose model is better for Minnesota, Trump or Walz?

Voters must weigh the governor’s fraud response against how MAGA tactics affect our state.

Columnist Icon
The Minnesota Star Tribune
December 16, 2025 at 10:59AM
The Minnesota State Capitol. (Renée Jones Schneider/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.

•••

For the next 11 months, whenever Gov. Tim Walz talks about fraud, for some it will be too little, too late.

That’s going to be the response and campaign battle cry from every Republican seeking to ensure Walz leaves office after two terms.

Want to know what Republicans plan to do about grocery prices, property taxes or gun safety? Well, let’s talk about fraud, they’ll say.

“We literally have the Democrats handing us what I would argue is the greatest controversy to run against in the last 20 years,” GOP operative Preya Samsundar told a colleague last week.

Translation: Republicans believe the human services fraud is their magic carpet ride to the statewide victories they’ve been unable to win on merit or ideas.

Walz is in the fight of his political life. On Friday, he announced Tim O’Malley as head of program integrity, aka the fraud czar, the guy to develop a statewide fraud prevention program.

Walz cited O’Malley’s history, chief judge for the state Office of Administrative Hearings, former BCA superintendent under GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty and FBI agent.

For nearly a decade, O’Malley worked for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, trying to restore integrity amid the mess left from clergy sex abuse scandals.

When O’Malley stepped to the microphone at his introduction, he was strictly business, offering an observation and a point of clarity.

The observation: “No one has any tolerance for fraud. It’s a widespread problem in Minnesota and across our country. It erodes trust and must be addressed head on. Minnesotans deserve to know that their tax dollars are being put to good use, and they deserve to know that they can trust our public institutions.”

Then he said, “Know that I’m not here to serve [Walz]. I’m not here to serve any individual, and I’m not here to serve a political party. I’m here to serve Minnesotans.”

We should hope his game plan is as no-nonsense as his demeanor and that he can erect guardrails against the ever-evolving and opportunistic fraudsters.

Will it be too little, too late? Will Minnesotans decide they’ve had enough of Walz, toss him out and lay down the red welcome mat for the MAGA acolytes who want to succeed him?

The Republicans have chosen their lane. Their response to the O’Malley announcement was swift and withering. Republican gubernatorial candidate and state Rep. Kristin Robbins of Maple Grove issued a single sentence, “The Walz fraud prevention program should be his resignation.”

Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, said Walz “wants to sweep all his failures under the rug.”

Republican U.S. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer isn’t running for governor, but he said Trump had “stepped up” where Walz had failed.

The word fraud is a crisp word, a spry, highly weaponized cudgel. But what happened in Minnesota is so complicated that we still can’t agree on the scope. A Minnesota Star Tribune article recently tallied the total to $217.7 million. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, who convicted dozens in the schemes, said he expects the final tally to be in the billions.

Was the Walz administration’s response to fraud slow-footed, unimaginative and inadequate? Minnesotans will ultimately decide. But both Walz and his Republican challengers must be viewed and considered beyond this weighty issue.

One thing about Walz is that he isn’t a glib, smooth talker who glosses over issues. He wrestles with decisions. He knows that the recent fraud imperils the ability of government to improve lives.

“We are a state that chooses not to let people go hungry or homeless or uneducated,” he said Friday. “However, that generosity has been taken advantage of by an organized group of fraudsters and criminals. Minnesota’s long-standing high standards of integrity of public funds go hand in hand with a culture of generosity. You can’t have one without the other.”

Even now, in the fight of his political career, Walz is still trying to elevate government’s ability to do good. Meanwhile the Republicans’ aim is far less complicated or solution-oriented. Screaming about fraud isn’t a remedy.

But even as they pound Walz, the Republicans who would lead this state must be compelled to explain how they balance support for Trump with the best interests of Minnesotans, and the pursuit of integrity in government.

This president has engaged in a campaign to bomb boats carrying suspected drug dealers off the coast of Venezuela while freeing a convicted drug dealer, former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández.

This president freed David Gentile, a former private equity executive from prison and relieved him of $15.5 million in restitution he owed to his victims.

This president wants to hand out a $12 billion aid package and counting to soybean farmers after he destroyed their ability to sell the crops with the tariffs he slapped on China.

Walz’s entire record should be weighed against that of his would-be successors. Yes, Walz must be held to account for his fraud response. But Minnesotans must also push Republicans to explain why they believe Trump’s strongman actions and self-dealing are the better fit for the future of Minnesota — and how modeling such questionable behavior will somehow make this state a better place.

about the writer

about the writer

Rochelle Olson

Editorial Columnist

Rochelle Olson is a columnist on the Minnesota Star Tribune Editorial Board focused on politics and governance.

See Moreicon

More from Columnists

See More
card image
Renée Jones Schneider/The Minnesota Star Tribune

Voters must weigh the governor’s fraud response against how MAGA tactics affect our state.

card image
card image