With Windows 7 scheduled for release Oct. 22, the question many readers will be asking is, "Should I upgrade?" The answer depends on your circumstances.
If you're frustrated with Windows Vista because it crashes or is slow, you should definitely upgrade to Windows 7. I've been using a preview copy of Windows 7, and I prefer it to Vista because it's more stable and faster.
In a review of Windows 7 prior to its release, the technical website ZDNet.com said that "subjectively, the change from Vista to Windows 7 is like releasing a car's handbrake." For details, see blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=22006.
If Vista is working for you, you don't need to upgrade. The Windows 7 user experience won't be that much different because the improvements are largely "under the hood," such as more efficient use of memory, which causes a PC to start up faster and use fewer of the PC's resources while it runs.
If you've got a PC that's more than three years old and runs Windows XP, you may not want to upgrade. ZDNet.com said that while Windows 7 was faster than Windows XP, XP "remains more capable for devices with limited memory and outdated graphics."
You can find system requirements for Windows 7 at www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/get/system-requirements.aspx, and upgrade advice at www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/get/upgrade-advisor.aspx.
Are there any new PCs that can't run Windows 7? Microsoft says no. ZDNet says the only new PCs that aren't suitable are netbooks (downsized laptops) that use the least-capable Intel Atom processor. Note: The optional XP Mode for Windows 7, which can be downloaded for free, has a special requirement: chips that include Intel "virtualization technology" or AMD-V processor chips.
Q I have Windows Vista on a desktop PC (32-bit version) and a laptop (64-bit version), and both PCs have 4 gigabytes of RAM. If I upgrade to Windows 7, would it make sense to install the 64-bit version on both PCs? Will I need to reload programs or data after the upgrade?
