Where were Minnesota’s fur trading posts located long ago?

Waterways were key to trade routes hundreds of years ago. Historic sites include the Snake River Fur Post and Grand Portage National Monument.

The Minnesota Star Tribune
September 12, 2025 at 11:00AM
The Snake River Fur Post near Pine City was reconstructed to show how it looked in 1804. (Erica Pearson/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Listen and subscribe to our podcast: Apple Podcasts | Spotify

“There was a fur post near you!”

That’s what author and illustrator Carl Gawboy wrote next to a hand-drawn map of Minnesota in his book “Fur Trade Nation: An Ojibwe’s Graphic History.” Gawboy’s pen-and-ink drawing shows the state peppered with dots marking trading post sites.

​​Reader Carla Nelson has been wondering how those long-ago locations were chosen. Nelson, who left Minnesota for Georgia when she retired, remains curious about her home state’s history.

She asked Curious Minnesota, the Strib’s reader powered reporting project: “In the earlier years of Minnesota, how was it decided where to establish trading posts?”

The short answer: Waterways were key. So were the preferences of the tribal communities partnering in the French, British and American fur trade that flourished from the mid-1600s to the mid-1800s.

“It’s all about location, location, location. The first thing you need to have a successful trading post is access to a waterway. Lakes and rivers are the highways of the 1600s, 1700s and 1800s,” said Bill Convery, director of research at the Minnesota Historical Society.

“The second important factor is you need to have customers, right? The fur traders would consult with their Ojibwe or Dakota partners and customers — and sometimes kin, if they were married into the tribal communities — about the best location to place a trading post,” he said.

Hundreds of people go to Grand Portage every year to learn about the historic fur trade. (Alex Chhith/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

‘On almost every large lake and stream’

The fur trade was a powerful industry in its time. It was a partnership between European Americans and Ojibwe and Dakota people, who already had long-established trade routes and trading customs, Convery said.

“The Ojibwe and Dakotas controlled the fur side of the fur trade, and so they really had a lot of say on how the trade was conducted, so much so that the Europeans really adopted a lot of Native American systems,” he said. “The systems of kinship and reciprocity and gift giving became major parts of the trade because that’s how the Ojibwes and Dakotas had traded with each other and among themselves for hundreds and even thousands of years.”

As the European market for beaver fur top hats boomed, trading became dominated by two British companies — Hudson’s Bay Company and North West Company. The North West Company developed a new, competitive business model by going directly to where Native trappers lived and setting up as many forts as possible.

Gawboy’s graphic history contains drawings of several posts, including the “small city” of Grand Portage on the north shore of Lake Superior, where the North West Company collected furs before workers called voyageurs paddled them by canoe to Montreal.

“There was a fur post on almost every large lake and stream, of different national origins. Some operated only a season, some grew into modern towns,” Gawboy wrote.

During a tour of the Sibley House historic site, Wesley Stone showed off a beaver hat like one that could have been worn by Henry Sibley during a tour of the Cold Store, where fur trappers traded their furs for dry goods.
During a tour of the Sibley House historic site, Wesley Stone shows off a beaver hat like one that could have been worn by Henry Sibley, during a tour of the Cold Store, where fur trappers traded their furs for dry goods. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

It’s difficult to say exactly how many trading posts there were in the lands that became Minnesota, Convery said.

In 1930, a Minnesota Historical Society historian named Grace Lee Nute went through trading companies’ business records as well as traders’ letters and journals. She tallied up every single mention she could find.

“She counted 132 posts, although we’re talking over a 200-some year period,” Convery said.

Archaeological digs and reconstructed forts

By the 1840s, beaver fur hats had fallen out of fashion — silk was the most popular material. The American Fur Company, which had its headquarters in Mendota, dissolved in 1847, according to a Minnesota Historical Society article.

More than a century later, archaeologists dug for fur-trade-era artifacts across the state. The National Park Service and Minnesota Historical Society rebuilt some of the posts that were part of the fur trade in Minnesota.

The Park Service opened Grand Portage National Monument on the shore of Lake Superior in 1960. Today, the historic site is administered by the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the Park Service. It includes reconstructed buildings, including the Great Hall where the North West Company held its annual shareholder meeting, and a visitors center and museum.

The Little Elk Heritage Preserve archaeological dig in summer 1984. Located about 2 miles north of Little Falls, Minn., the site suggests that Fort Duquesne, a French trading post, was located there. (Institute of Minnesota Archaeology)

In 1970, the Minnesota Historical Society finished reconstructing a North West Company post on the Snake River near Pine City and opened it as a historic site. (Today, the Snake River Fur Post grounds and trails are free to visit and open from dawn to dusk, but the society closed the site’s visitors center in September because of budget cuts. It is not currently hosting tours or field trips.)

Interpretive signs along the Snake River describe the site’s history, and a tall stockade surrounds the post itself, a single long log building with living quarters, a storage room and a trading room.

“All the principal Men [of the Snake River Ojibwe] came here to fix on a place for my Winter’s abode,” trader John Sayer, who established the post, wrote in his journal on Oct. 1, 1804.

Besides being on a river, the post needed to be on high ground so that it wouldn’t flood, according to the Historical Society. It also had to be in a place with abundant beaver and other furbearers and near a source of clay to build its three fireplaces.

The post operated for less than a year. By April 27, 1805, Sayer wrote in his journal, “Pack’d up all our Baggage & at 2PM embark’d.”

Sayer never returned, and the site eventually became a cornfield.

In the 1930s, a local boy found tools, jewelry and shards of pottery in the field. He later brought them to the Minnesota Historical Society, sparking the archaeological dig that led to the post’s reconstruction.

Decades later, a similar discovery is still possible, Convery said.

“I think there are still fur trading posts out there to be discovered. Our knowledge is only as good as the records that we’re aware of,” said Convery. “From time to time, new records come up, or new archaeological discoveries are found, which changes our understanding of the fur trade. The really exciting thing about history is that we never write the final word on this.”

If you’d like to submit a Curious Minnesota question, fill out the form below:

Read more Curious Minnesota stories:

about the writer

about the writer

Erica Pearson

Reporter

Erica Pearson is a reporter and editor at the Star Tribune.

See Moreicon

More from Curious Minnesota

See More
"Santa" waved to people as he made his way to the Christmas photo booth at Southdale Mall, Friday, December 4, 2015 in Edina, MN.
card image