Opinion editor’s note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Minnesota Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
The U.S. Department of Justice says it has no interest in investigating Renee Good’s death by an ICE agent. Federal officials have already labeled the killing a defensive act and moved on. But if that conclusion is sound, it should withstand scrutiny beyond the walls of Washington.
What is unfolding in Minnesota is not merely a transparency dispute. It’s a breakdown in due process at a moment of intense national scrutiny. When federal authorities barred state investigators from reviewing evidence in a fatal shooting on a south Minneapolis street, they did more than limit access. They denied the public a credible and independent accounting of the federal killing of an American citizen.
Good, 37, died Jan. 7 after she was shot multiple times by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jonathan Ross. Video from multiple bystanders and Ross’ own phone has gone viral.
But state law enforcement officials have been frozen out of the investigation into Good’s death. If the DOJ believes its conclusion is sound, federal officials should promptly share the evidence with Minnesota law enforcement for an independent review.
A thorough review of the evidence by a trusted Minnesota agency could help de-escalate dangerous tensions between ICE agents and activists on our streets. Continuing to block state law enforcement professionals will do just the opposite, deepening distrust in a city still recovering from George Floyd’s 2020 murder by a police officer.
Transparency is both vital and useful at this volatile moment, and there are multiple reasons justifying further review of Good’s death and Ross’ role in it. For example, video analysis by the New York Times, as well as use-of-force experts interviewed by the Star Tribune, dispute federal officials’ justification that Ross acted in self-defense.