A group of 33 former federal prosecutors in Minnesota are asking the Trump administration to reconsider its decision to exclude the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension from the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Good by a federal agent last week, according to a Jan. 14 letter obtained by the Minnesota Star Tribune.
The move comes one day after a group of six prosecutors, including former acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, resigned their jobs to protest the decision and other recent moves by the U.S. Department of Justice.
In interviews, former prosecutors said the scale of the departures is unprecedented in Minnesota and will hamper the government’s ability to prosecute fraudsters, which Trump officials have cited as a reason for bringing 3,000 ICE agents to the state.
“Yesterday was the darkest day for federal law enforcement in my 51 years of practicing law,” former Assistant U.S. Attorney Doug Kelley said in an interview. “When dedicated public servants who have spent their lives prosecuting cases find it necessary to resign because they are confronted with orders that offend their sense of morality, that is a very sad day for justice in Minnesota.”
Thompson and other federal prosecutors who resigned this week have not yet made any public statements. Daniel Rosen, President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the office, also has not responded to requests for comment.
Federal officials claim Minnesota has no jurisdiction in the Good case, which is being handled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Local prosecutors dispute that assertion, saying they have the power to investigate and bring criminal charges if warranted.
Good was fatally shot by ICE agent Jonathan Ross during an operation on Jan. 7 after she disregarded commands to get out of her car and tried to drive away from the scene. On Jan. 13, Assistant Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a statement saying there is “no basis” for a criminal civil rights investigation.
Three lawyers who previously led the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota disputed that notion, saying the government can’t make such a determination without conducting a thorough investigation.