For Alyssa Thiede, the curator at Hennepin History Museum, her connection to a new exhibit about an enslaved woman freed through a controversial trial in 1860 is professional but also personal.
“I think most historians that are familiar with the story would admit that they don’t know anything about Eliza Winston,” Thiede said about the exhibit, “Winston: A Woman’s Fight for Freedom in Minnesota.” “And what they knew about the story was mainly about the white male abolitionists that helped her to become free, so obviously a big part, one of our biggest goals, was to re-center Eliza Winston in her own narrative.”
Winston is one of the heroines history often hides.
She was freed from slavery on a trip to Minnesota with her enslavers. With the help of Emily Goodridge Grey, a noteworthy abolitionist who made Winston’s freedom her cause, she was set free by a Minnesota judge, despite local backlash. The case was built on the idea that Minnesota’s anti-slavery laws trumped federal laws like the Dred Scott ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court that continued to back forced labor in the United States.
The exhibit, which was co-curated by author Chris Lehman, aims to highlight Winston’s quest and the stories of people like Grey, whose home was damaged by a mob after the ruling. The exhibit contains artifacts and even commissioned artwork — there are no known photographs of Winston — that honor Winston’s journey to freedom. The exhibit “reveals a remarkable journey of bravery and determination, and sheds light on Minnesota’s complex relationship with slavery,” the museum writes.
And that’s my interest here.
I’ve found that Minnesotans often do not know enough about the atrocities that have unfolded right in their own backyards. The lynchings in Duluth and Mankato. The destruction of the Rondo neighborhood in St. Paul. Redlining and segregated schools. And, of course, this state’s ties to slavery. Slave owners — and their billfolds — were given the Minnesota Nice treatment more than 150 years ago.
“Wealthy slaveholders enjoyed their vacations away from home without losing the comfort of service from the people they owned; because northern merchants depended on enslavers’ spending, the southerners faced no legal consequences for violating the antislavery laws,” Lehman, a St. Cloud State professor, wrote in his book “It Took Courage: Eliza Winston’s Quest for Freedom.” “The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford legalized this activity in all U.S. territories, including Minnesota Territory, in March 1857. Fourteen months later, when the new state of Minnesota adopted a constitution that prohibited slavery, its residents continued to welcome enslavers and their captives.”