The debt-ceiling stalemate has put the nation's AAA credit rating at risk and has raised the specter of a global economic meltdown.
But it's becoming clearer by the day that even that may not be enough of a crisis to waken an ill-informed electorate to America's financial reality: Balancing the budget means we all need to pay more and expect less.
A new TV ad from AARP is just the latest symptom of the problem. A pugnacious older gent tells Congress to cut "waste and loopholes" -- not benefits for seniors. The ad plays directly to Americans' widespread budget misconceptions.
The reality is that programs serving seniors -- Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (pays for most nursing home care) are some of the biggest items in the federal budget, meaning the budget woes can't be fixed if they're declared off-limits.
There is not nearly enough waste out there to address the basic problem: The rising cost of benefits is outstripping previous and current taxpayer contributions to these programs, or will do so in the not-too-distant future.
Medicare, Medicaid and a children's health insurance program consumed 21 percent of federal dollars spent in 2010, with almost two-thirds of that ($452 billion) going to Medicare. Social Security ate up another 20 percent, the same percentage as defense.
But a recent poll found that 63 percent of those surveyed incorrectly believed that the government spends more on defense and foreign aid than it does on Medicare and Social Security. Moreover, just 44 percent believe that Medicare and Social Security are a major source of trouble for the federal budget.
The problem with these budget illusions is that too many people are convinced the nation's books can be balanced without costing them a dime. Politicians too often get reelected by telling voters what they want to hear: Somebody else will feel the budget ax or foot the bill.