Neel Kashkari, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, and others at the Federal Reserve, which traditionally has focused on inflation and unemployment data when thinking about interest rates, increasingly are looking at the effect of racial and economic disparities on individuals and the economy.
On Wednesday, the Minneapolis Fed is hosting a half-day roundtable for employers that will focus on opportunities to improve employee financial well-being.
A recent study by MetLife said one in five employees admitted they skipped work to focus on a financial problem. And many say they lack enough savings and have difficulty meeting monthly family expenses.
This comes against the backdrop of the Trump administration's proposed tax cuts that critics say favor the wealthy and business and will increase federal budget deficits.
The counter-argument says tax cuts should be targeted at people in households with incomes of under $100,000. Those people spend virtually all of their money and need to save more for retirement, economists say.
The affluent have done the best getting richer since the 1970s as wealth has concentrated markedly among the top 10 percent or so of Americans. Those on the lower end of pay also are disproportionately minorities.
Despite a nice across-the-board rise in incomes in 2016, by far the best since the end of the 2008-2009 Great Recession, the richest 1 percent of households controlled 38.6 percent of total wealth in 2016, up from 36.3 percent in 2013, and from about 30 percent in 1990, according to Federal Reserve statistics. Meanwhile, the bottom 90 percent of households controlled 22.8 percent of all wealth, down from more than 30 percent in 1990.
Stagnating wages and wealth have meant more stress on the working class, say the psychologists and nonprofit financial groups that work with many of them on financial issues. They effectively are making do with less. The working class is increasingly part-time and temporary workers with fewer benefits.