Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of material from 11 contributing columnists, along with other commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
What in the 1950s is going on here?
I was initially blissfully unaware of the conservative online uproar over the Minnesota Vikings’ addition of two male cheerleaders to the squad this year, with the notable exception of a strange meme I was sent from a friend in California depicting Gov. Tim Walz waving pompoms.
Well, that’s odd, I thought, and went back to my regularly scheduled summer programming of shuffling kids to a variety of sporting events, endlessly wiping countertops and attempting to somehow complete my actual paid work as well.
The same week, when a U.S. senator and former college football coach, who apparently has nothing better to do while serving as an elected leader of our government, slammed the Vikings for having the temerity to add male dancers to their cheer squad, my oldest son was attending a basketball camp. One of the featured athletes who helped lead the kids at camp was a women’s basketball player. My son recounted her stats to me, and he said the whole camp — boys and girls alike — had gotten her signature.
More of that energy, please, and less whining by far-past-puberty-age males who apparently view NFL games as an opportunity to ogle decades-younger women’s cleavage.
The thing I’m most confused about is the focus on cheerleading as a venue in which to judge and view women’s bodies. Maybe it’s the elder millennial in me, but I thought we’d long ago agreed that cheerleading was first and foremost a sport in its own right?