Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Star Tribune Opinion in recent days has featured several commentaries focused on Minneapolis policy and political topics (“Minneapolis doesn’t have a strong mayor, it has strong donors,” March 7; “Frey’s manufactured consent: How the city failed George Floyd Square,” March 5, and “Counterpoint: Public safety failures in Minneapolis now belong to the (strong) mayor,” March 3). Their timing and content being influenced by the pending election for mayor and City Council, each with a distinct anti-Mayor-Jacob-Frey, pro-current-City-Council-majority tilt. [Star Tribune opinion editor’s note: The George Floyd Square article also resulted in a response, “Counterpoint: Four and a half years of authentic community engagement at George Floyd Square,” March 7.]
I read them from my decadeslong perspective as a former Minneapolis City Council member and department head, and former chief executive of a prominent community nonprofit and influential business association. None of those experiences elevate my opinions over anyone else’s, but they do provide depth and historical context. With that in mind, I have three observations about the Frey/City-Council-majority dynamic.
Almost five years after the murder of George Floyd, public safety remains a defining issue. It is encouraging that after losing ground measured by rising crime statistics in 2024, several categories of serious offenses are down in the first months of this year. Great work, Public Safety Commissioner Todd Barnette and Police Chief Brian O’Hara, along with the men and women of the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD), other first responders, and those on the street providing mental health and violence interventions. In other words, the public safety team of the Frey administration.
What has the City Council majority done to help? In fairness, the MPD budget has risen, in large part to fund a council-delayed but much-needed new contract making compensation competitive as a key aspect of rebuilding the department. But measure that against numerous actions that undermine making Minneapolis safer for all, such as cutting police recruiting, wasteful use of state safety aid, limiting expansion of effective ShotSpotter technology, interference with the administration of safety contracts, disrespect shown after the death of officer Jamal Mitchell, to list just a few.
And with a long road to improved safety still ahead, it certainly is not helpful when the council majority is unduly influenced by loud, police-abolition-tinged voices that are wildly out of step with what most city residents want. Which brings me to a second observation.
I know from personal experience serving on the City Council is a challenging responsibility. While most matters are routine and unanimous, deciding high-profile issues prompting disagreement is the test of performance. This City Council majority has failed their governance test on several key topics. Not because Mayor Frey as executive leader did not do his job. Because pressure by vocal minorities have flummoxed them and prevented important decisions from being made.