Medtronic and Boston Scientific announced study results Friday that they said reflected positively on devices they are selling in the fast-growing field of neuromodulation.
Boston Scientific Corp. presented new clinical trial findings Friday for patients using two different modes in a spinal cord stimulation system, while Medtronic announced the results of a long-running trial of its implantable drug pump for patients with muscle spasticity following a stroke. The companies announced the data as an industry conference gathered this week in Las Vegas.
Unlike therapies that cure disease, neuromodulation devices usually seek to alter a patient's nerve activity in the hopes of relieving symptoms like chronic pain or muscle rigidity, often by applying electricity or chemicals near the spine, brain or major nerves.
Analysts say the multibillion-dollar device market is growing at more than 10 percent a year, driven partly by the awareness that such devices could play a role in curbing an epidemic of opioid overuse and misuse. Most neuromodulation devices require surgery and carry different risks than the drugs they are seeking to replace, and typically they are only available after more conservative therapies haven't gotten the desired results.
Boston Scientific on Friday published data from a randomized controlled trial called "Whisper" that found that patients who could use two different stimulation modes with its Precision spinal cord stimulation device achieved better pain control than using one mode alone.
The spinal cord stimulator delivers electric pulses from an implanted generator, similar to a pacemaker. The pulses vary in frequency, pulse width and amplitude in order to disrupt signals in the spinal cord and provide pain relief. The device can provide one therapy mode that causes a mild tingling sensation referred to as paresthesia, and another mode called subperception therapy that doesn't create the tingling.
The study of two groups of patients, one with 70 and one with 55 research subjects, found that people who used paresthesia therapy reported average reductions in baseline pain scores from 7.2 to 2.5, while patients who preferred subperception therapy reported average baseline pain score reductions from 7.1 to 3.8.
But when patients were able to choose which therapy they used, the number of people whose pain was considered "effectively controlled" increased by 62 percent, Boston Scientific reported in a news release. (The full study results weren't posted to clinicaltrials.gov as of Friday.)