The Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday upheld the state's approval of three pioneering electric vehicle charging programs run by Xcel Energy, quashing a challenge from two oil refineries and another large industrial customer of Xcel.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) in 2019 OK'd three Xcel pilot programs aimed at boosting electric vehicle (EV) use in Minnesota, specifically through residential and public charging systems.
Xcel Large Industrials (XLI), an ad hoc consortium of big power buyers, appealed the PUC's decision, claiming that Xcel's charging programs extend the utility's electric service beyond the point allowed by state law.
Typically, a utility's own equipment transmits electricity up to the meter of a house or business. XLI has argued that Xcel's EV programs put the company "behind the meter" — in other words, the equipment owned or managed by Xcel is inside a home, business or public agency.
The PUC rejected that argument and the appeals court agreed.
"We accordingly hold that [state law] is unambiguous in that it does not impose a limitation on the [PUC's] regulatory authority based on the location of the customer meter."
XLI, which for this particular suit included USG Interiors, Marathon Petroleum and Flint Hills Resources, said it's reviewing the appellate court's decision for any further appeal. (USG is a gypsum products manufacturer with a plant in Red Wing; Marathon has a refinery in St. Paul Park; and Koch Industries-owned Flint Hills runs a refinery in Rosemount.)
"XLI remains concerned about the potential rate impacts and business operational impacts of Xcel's increasing investments behind utility meters and into customers' homes and businesses," the group's attorney, Andrew Moratzka, said in an e-mail.