By many measures, including the effect on the economy, the pandemic has been devastating. But for job hunters, the prospects looked a lot worse during the Great Recession.
In June, according to federal data released last week, there were three unemployed people for every job opening in the U.S. That was down from 3.9 in May and 4.6 in April, an improving trend that tracked the reopening of much of the economy.
Even at their worst, these numbers don't rival those from the second half of 2009, when the U.S. was mired in a deep recession. At that time, more than six unemployed people were competing for every job opening. And the ratio remained high for years, not falling to 3-1 until early 2013.
At the time, job hunters often complained about the tough labor market, saying companies were looking for "a purple squirrel." That was a metaphor for a job candidate with an unworldly mix of experience, skills and pay history. In other words, employers wanted applicants who didn't exist.
Today, many companies have said they can't get workers to return, either because they're afraid of being exposed to COVID-19 or they don't want to give up unemployment benefits, which had included an extra $600 a week from the feds.
The number of job openings remains high by historical standards. At the end of June, there were 5.9 million openings, on par with monthly averages in 2015, '16 and early '17. That's also more than double the monthly openings during the 2009 recession.
That sounds promising for the unemployed, but a Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) economist warns against reading too much into the data.
"Because of what's going on, I'm not sure what it tells us," said Cheryl Abbott, a regional economist at the BLS. "These job openings may be on the books at a company, but a month from now, that company may be out of business."