I'm a sucker for second-chance stories. That's one reason I reached former Minnesota House GOP Speaker Steve Sviggum on an Arizona golf course last week to talk about his bid to rejoin the University of Minnesota Board of Regents.
As is his wont, Sviggum politely agreed to chat. In the 38 years since his freshman year (and mine) at the Legislature, I've never known the 65-year-old farmer and former math teacher from Kenyon to be anything but courteous to us Capitol scribes. The respect became mutual and served him well through eight sessions (1999-2006) in the big chair at the front of the House chamber. (Take a lesson, President Trump.)
But good feeling didn't keep this newspaper from urging Sviggum to make a tough choice in 2012: Either continue to serve as a top staffer to the state Senate GOP caucus, or remain on the Board of Regents. Doing both is a conflict of interest.
Sviggum did not agree then, and says he still doesn't. Nevertheless, he yielded to the judgment of those who perceived a conflict and resigned from the board.
He did not have to do so. He'd been elected in 2011 for a six-year term, and no one could force him out. But Sviggum had not sought a regents' seat to stroke his own ego or stay in the public eye after his long legislative career ended. He wanted to be an effective contributor to governing what he calls "the most important public institution in the state," and he rightly saw that his effectiveness was in doubt.
"I didn't want a confrontation or any conflict about me to erode the university's mission or effort," he said last week. "It's too important. This is the institution that drives this state."
I share that view. It's the other reason I called.
A Board of Regents election should not pass unnoticed. That board should include Minnesota's best-and-brightest leaders of large, complex, publicly accountable institutions. It should also broadly reflect the economic variety and demographic diversity of this state.