As an NFL rookie in 1999, Antoine Winfield just assumed he was required to wear pads on his legs as he was in college. That was until he looked around the Buffalo locker room and noticed many of the veteran defensive backs wore pants without padding.
"I'm like, 'Doesn't anyone wear pads?'" Winfield recalled. "So I had to fit in. That's an ugly look. A cornerback with thigh pads and knee pads? I don't think you'll see one in the league."
It's certainly become a rarity, because players on both sides of the ball prefer a sleeker look. Few wide receivers and defensive backs wear any pads below the waist these days. Even some linebackers, including the Vikings' Chad Greenway, use a lightweight, streamlined version of thigh pads.
The two most popular reasons are speed and fashion appeal. Players feel less restrictive without pads on their legs, thus making them feel faster, even if the benefit is more psychological than truth.
Others simply subscribe to the "look good, play good" theory. Whatever their reasoning, players say they're willing to deal with an occasional deep thigh bruise in order to keep their legs free of pads.
"I've never worn any pads on my legs since I've been in the league," Arizona Cardinals All-Pro wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald Jr. said. "It's all about speed, especially for a guy like me who's already not fast enough."
Now in his 13th season, Winfield also has never worn leg pads and isn't about to change.
"It's all mental," the Pro Bowl cornerback said. "We all think it makes us faster, but it's the look. You want to get out there with your uniform looking nice. You don't want big pads. That's not a good look."