Anyone who worries about the U.S. men's national teams having a chance at winning the World Cup, or who worries about whether Major League Soccer can be an elite league in world soccer, also worries that America doesn't do enough to develop youth soccer talent.
The inevitable conclusion of anyone who studies the problem is some version of the same statement: There are not enough resources for youth soccer, and we need to start focusing on developing the best of the best, as they do in Brazil or England or Germany.
Talk to any player who's come up through that type of system and they'll describe being battle-hardened at the age of 11 or 12, fighting for their place — and their future — on a weekly basis, despite being barely old enough for middle school.
"You have to have thick skin when you're young," said former Minnesota United star Pablo Campos, who played for the youth teams of several large Brazilian clubs before moving to America to play college soccer. "You have to know that the pressure is going to make you better, because the pressure is going to be there all the time. You grow up with having to be your best at like [age] 10 or 12."
It's impossible to fault this setup's ability to turn out dedicated, experienced players. A young player simply cannot make it without being focused, without being fully committed, without having not only the awesome talent to excel but also the mental and emotional strength to simply survive.
But is it actually better, overall, than the one America has now?
The Guardian newspaper recently did a study of the youth academies of every Premier League team. In the 1990s, England introduced new, more stringent requirements for top-level youth academies, in hopes of stimulating player development. Players sign with clubs starting at age 8. By age 16, when players can sign contracts, only the best of the best remain. And still, an astonishing 99 percent of those 16-year-olds did not become pro soccer players.
If you're only concerned with developing the best of the best, a streamlining of the U.S. youth soccer system is long overdue. There are at least five different, sometimes overlapping, national organizations for youth soccer players, and that's not counting high school or college teams. Understanding the system seems impossible, never mind navigating it, and the sometimes outlandish costs of participation are too much for some kids.