The timing of Wednesday's layoffs at Target Corp. had more to do with the accounting calendar than with anything connected to the company's now-famous data breach.
There has likely been a plan to skinny down the cost structure since well before Target discovered a data breach in December, and the layoffs happened this week because the Minneapolis-based company's fiscal year always ends on the Saturday closest to Jan. 31.
That means the company wanted to get the costs associated with eliminating 475 jobs booked in a fourth quarter that was already going to be a total washout.
There is a great temptation to see any news out of Target, including the dropping of health care benefits for some part-time workers, through a lens colored by the data breach. That would not be the right way to think about any of these more recent announcements.
A decision to discontinue health benefits for part-timers was likely months in the making and reflected a growing practice among large companies with big part-time workforces.
It's also unlikely that a layoff of 475 had much to do directly with the data breach and the impact on sales and customer traffic that resulted. Target's U.S. sales growth had been sluggish and store traffic down well before the cybercrooks showed up, and the company has been signaling for months that controlling the growth of expenses is a top priority.
Last fall at Target's conference for investors and analysts, senior executives spent much of their time talking about Target's difficult expansion into Canada this fiscal year. At the end, executives rolled around to Target's long-term financial plan for earnings growth. It included keeping the U.S. retail operation's cash earnings margin healthy.
It was the analyst from the investment firm Jefferies who asked the basic follow-up question. With U.S. comparable-store sales barely growing and customer traffic down, how exactly is the company going to do that?