Responding to U.S. Sen. and presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar's endorsement of legalizing marijuana (front page, Feb. 23) and the University of Minnesota's finding that marijuana use may contribute to lower grade-point averages (front page, Feb. 21), I'd like to bring up an important (but not as widely shared) quote from the "wanna toke" conversation between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Joe Rogan on Rogan's podcast a while back. After taking his infamous toke, Musk said he doesn't actually smoke weed, since "I do not find that it's very good for productivity." Truer words were never spoken.
Michele Maurer, Hopkins
GUN LAWS, PART ONE
We need to be civil, dispassionate in this ongoing discussion
During a gun-rights rally organized by the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus on Saturday at the State Capitol ("Hundreds rally for gun rights at Capitol," Feb. 24), state Rep. Cal Bahr, R-East Bethel, told the group: "There's a lot of us in this room that have had enough, and it's time to start riding herd on the rest of these people that want to take your rights away from you. They will not go quietly into the good night. They need to be kicked to the curb and stomped on and run over a few times."
If the members of the Gun Owners Caucus are, in fact, the law-abiding citizens they claim to be, they will condemn these violent words as we debate our issues peacefully, in a civil fashion.
Rich Smith, Taylors Falls
• • •
After reading the Feb. 24 issue of the Star Tribune, two disturbing pieces stood out. "Hundreds rally for gun rights at Capitol" and the editorial "Election security aid is still held hostage" made one question the ethics of Republicans.
In the first article, in addition to Bahr's concerning statement, state Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, is quoted as saying: "History clearly shows us, through the millions who have died because of government's confiscation of guns, that we must stand firm." Speech suggesting violent solutions and false and undocumented threats concerning deaths of millions because guns were taken away is at best imprecise speech, and at worst deliberately false or misleading — incitement that has no place in discourse from supposed political leaders.
The other disturbing news regarding questionable Republican leadership, regarding the reluctance to release federal security aid to help prevent election interference, makes one wonder what is gained from stalling. Are Republicans anticipating that any interference or meddling may be helpful to their party?
Laurie Anderson, Bloomington
• • •
While watching the news on Venezuela, did you happen to notice that the people were throwing stones at the military? Why? Because they have no weapons. This is what happens when the government wants to be your mother and father and run your life. What you can say and can't say, what you can wear, how much you can earn, what you can spend it on, where you have to live, how long you can live, whether or not you get the care you need. The government wants to run your life from birth to death, and you better go along. Because they know best! Sound familiar? Twenty years ago the people of Venezuela were doing quite well! What happened? Government! You can't let the government run your life!
Aren't you glad that our forefathers added the right to bear arms!