•••
The Star Tribune and other media outlets must stop using the term “immigration crackdown” in connection with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Patrol and other Department of Homeland Security agency actions in Minnesota (for example, “Twin Cities immigration crackdown delays home construction, slows real estate market,” StarTribune.com, Feb. 9). The same reporting regularly finds that the vast majority of people arrested in these sweeps are being illegally detained, since they typically have proper immigration status or are full citizens. It’s not a crackdown if these supposed law enforcement agencies are intentionally missing the target so much of the time and choosing to inflict collateral damage instead. This is state terrorism against citizens and legal residents, and the false “crackdown” framing only lends legitimacy to clearly unconstitutional actions.
Michael Hicks, Minneapolis
•••
As congressional Democrats spar with Republicans over funding, contingent on negotiating DHS enforcement policies, I’m not really hearing straightforward drill-down questions of DHS’ motivations.
- What is it about ICE enforcement that’s so much more inherently dangerous than experienced by any other law enforcement officers? Why do ICE agents need masks, anonymity and extrajudicial detainment? Are criminal illegal immigrants any more dangerous than our own homegrown criminals? We can certainly be assured there are a lot less of the illegal immigrant type.
- Do we really need an ICE force in numbers greater than all local law enforcement to catch this supposedly limited number of people? And why do we need new “black site” extrajudicial detention facilities to house them?
- Once we have already built these facilities, what’s to stop the government from using them to house any future undesirable individuals that need disappearing? If we ever get rid of all the illegal immigrants, we’ll have a ton of available “black site” spaces to fill, where habeas corpus rights don’t apply and no judicial warrants are required.
The answers seem to be:
- Masks, anonymity and extrajudicial detainment are for expediency and intimidation of all citizens and immigrants — illegal or otherwise.
- The force numbers and “black sites” are needed to round up and house thousands of immigrants, including those without criminal backgrounds and even those legal with pending immigration cases.
- The policies will be justified by a no-questions-asked, noncontingent, fully funded new and recurring DHS budget.
Please convince me I’m wrong!