An excellent article Jan. 4 about free transit in Kansas City ("Other cities have tried free transit, but in Twin Cities, fares not going away"). There are clearly benefits to eliminating fares, which would reduce the gap between lower- and higher-income groups; and improve service, since riders could board more quickly, reducing idling. Most important, drivers would not be distracted by their collection duties and would be better able to focus on driving.
But can we afford to publicly subsidize the entire cost of mass transit? The article stated that 22% of the funding for our transit system comes from ridership and gave the impression that without these fares, there would be a corresponding shortfall, but that's not true. The collection and management of fares is expensive. Bus drivers spend precious time collecting. There are also cashboxes, printers and scanners in each bus that require maintenance, as well as layers of accounting and administrative support. Subtract the costs associated with fare collection, and we're much closer to 100% funding with no additional subsidies.
Paul Smith, Minneapolis
GUNS
Not just a St. Paul problem, not just an African-American problem
Regarding "St. Paul's deadly year: High toll of 2019" (Jan. 5):
While each one of the 28 homicides from a gun in St. Paul last year is a tragedy for the individuals who died, their families and the entire community, no reader should believe that gun violence in Minnesota is a problem limited to young men of color. The latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data tell the full story: In 2017, there were 78 victims of homicide by gun in Minnesota. By comparison, there were 365 deaths by suicide in which a gun was used; 319 of those suicide victims were white males. It is not just the African-American community of St. Paul that has a gun violence problem; all of us in the state have a gun violence problem, and we need to deal with it. States that have closed the private purchase background check loophole and have adopted extreme risk protection order laws have lowered their deaths from gun violence. There is no reason that Minnesotans shouldn't enjoy the same relief.
Thomas Erling Kottke, St. Paul
• • •
Instead of telling us how lucky we are that there are good guys with guns (Dallas Morning News editorial reprinted in the Star Tribune opinion section Jan. 5), shouldn't we be demanding controls so that bad guys can't get them? That would save the innocent lives we're losing before the good guys have a chance to draw.
Brian Miller, River Falls, Wis.
• • •
So St. Louis Park is going to pass a law so that no vaping material can be sold in the city (Minnesota section, Jan. 8). Gee, I wonder how many people in the history of St. Louis Park have been shot by assault rifles? Killed by drunken drivers? How many were injured, how many killed? How many died from vaping?
I just love (sarcastic, I can assure you) politicians who ignore things that really matter and find the ones that affect the least amount of people, so they can beat their chests at how brave and strong they are.
There have been 55 deaths due to vaping in 27 states. Oh, and eight people were killed by guns in St Louis Park in 2019.