Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Forty years ago, Gov. Rudy Perpich signed the Postsecondary Enrollment Options into law, allowing eligible high school juniors and seniors in Minnesota to earn college credits.
The program was the first of its kind and remains the most generous of any dual enrollment initiative in the country. Minnesota students and families do not pay for college in the PSEO program, nor for concurrent enrollment credits offered in the high schools. Funding follows students to the institution they choose.
PSEO became an immediate hit with students and their families. It cut the rapidly increasing cost of college tuition, allowing students to earn degrees earlier and with less debt. But PSEO’s funding model continues to foster a complicated, often contentious relationship between schools and colleges. Today, PSEO enjoys bipartisan support but also demonstrates the need for systemic reform.
A 21st-century vision for advanced education
When the PSEO program started, Perpich wanted to increase access to advanced coursework and the number of Minnesota students who went to college. His perspective was personal. Higher education had propelled the Iron Range son of a Croatian-American miner to dentistry, the state Senate and eventually the governor’s mansion.
“My commitment is to make sure we’re prepared for the 21st century,” Perpich told a December 1985 gathering of skeptical superintendents in Marshall, Minn., as reported by the Worthington Daily Globe.
Well, here we are in the 21st century. Zeke Jackson, director of the nonprofit People for PSEO, says the program is more popular than ever. “It’s the cost of college,” he said. “There are other reasons, but that is the biggest one and the one that is continuing to change the fastest and put the most pressure on students.”