Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of commentary online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Today, bureaucrats scan spreadsheets to cancel federal grants containing the words “climate change.” And yet, during a recent trip to Duluth, I saw work on a $3.15 million U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project to bolster the Canal Park shoreline. The new design responds to more frequent storms that have caused extensive damage to the popular lake walk in recent years.
Canal Park is now more climate-resilient; people are working, and taxpayers will pay less for repairs in the long run. It’s just fortunate that the word “climate” didn’t appear in the project title, or else it might have been laid low by the cool blade of Ctrl + F.
Climate change, renewable energy and developing industries will define this era whether we like it or not. But reactionary partisanship — perhaps best personified by laughing-face social media emojis — is changing how we talk about climate, especially its relationship to our economic well-being.
And maybe that’s a good thing in the long run.
Climate is about much more than carbon; it’s the way we live, as cultural as it is ecological. Climate solutions will improve people’s lives, or they aren’t solutions at all. That’s a challenging truth, but potentially a unifying one.
I made my way to a coffee shop in the Lincoln Park Craft District, a growing commercial hub in a historically distressed central Duluth neighborhood. There I met Galen Treuer, who grew up in Duluth’s hillside neighborhood and more recently spent almost six years managing climate and resilience strategy for Miami-Dade County in south Florida. He faced more frequent and powerful hurricanes, historic floods and the literal destruction of communities. Now he’s back home, with a new perspective on Duluth’s future.