investing janet kidd stewart |
Are we hard-wired to shun certain retirement investments?
Some new research suggests so, and that has implications as the government gives the green light to annuities in 401(k)s and IRAs.
In a research brief for the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Prof. Jeffrey Brown of the University of Illinois notes that more than half of pensioners elect to keep their monthly payout rather than convert to a lump sum, but very few 401(k) owners elect to turn their balances into annuities.
This "may suggest a strong bias in favor of the pre-existing default rather than rational, well-informed decisions," Brown wrote.
He also found consumers are way off the mark when they try to value monthly benefits.
Using Social Security benefits as a proxy for annuities, he found most individuals were only willing to pay a very small amount for a $100 increase in monthly benefits — an amount they could recoup in payouts in 30 months — and were only willing to give up $100 in benefits for a much higher price.
"Individuals were internally inconsistent," Brown said in an interview. In other words, the same individual would demand an unrealistically cheap price to buy into a higher monthly benefit, but if he had a monthly benefit, would demand a much higher price to convert it to a lump sum.
What about legitimate concerns individuals might have about private annuities, including the risk of default of a carrier or their potential to lag behind inflation?