For the past 20 years, Fluidyne Engineering Corp. has depended on financial guarantees from the U.S. Export-Import Bank to stay in business. The bank guarantees that Fluidyne will receive regular payments on its sales of heating systems to foreign customers. But the small Minneapolis company has not cost the taxpayers a dime.
So a push among Tea Party Republicans to kill the bank because it represents "corporate welfare" leaves company founder Leonard Frame frustrated.
"People who are pursuing this don't realize how important it is to businesses," Frame said. "If the bank is killed, we would have to find a business model that is not export-related or we would die."
An ideological divide among Republicans has endangered thousands of businesses across the country as the party fights over the so-called Ex-Im Bank, which offers loans, credit insurance and loan guarantees to American exporters and their foreign customers. Free-market purists and small-government libertarians within the GOP don't want to reauthorize funding for Ex-Im when it runs out Oct. 1.
What was once a pro-forma bipartisan exercise has turned into a political grind that leaves business owners outside the Beltway shaking their heads in bemusement and worry.
"It's really simple," said Rick Barrett, the export sales manager at Midwest Hardwood Corp. in Maple Grove. "If they take this away, it puts all of our 350 jobs at risk."
Since 2007, Ex-Im, which borrows from the U.S. Treasury to provide various financial services to American exporters and their customers, has disbursed $116 billion to 7,399 U.S. businesses, including 173 in Minnesota, and helped generate more than $235 billion in exports. The bank has paid back every dollar and earned $2 billion more in profits in the past five years.
But the inclusion of huge corporate players such as Boeing and General Electric on its list of beneficiaries has drawn the ire of free-market think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and small-government advocates like the Tea Party. Their influence on the funding debate became clear when California Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy was recently elected majority leader of the House. One of McCarthy's first official acts was to change his position from supporting reauthorization of Ex-Im to opposing it.