Opinion | Supporters of Boundary Waters mining just refuse to give up

What looked like protection for the wilderness watershed just two years ago is threatened with reversal.

October 2, 2025 at 10:59AM
Fall Lake, near Winton, Minn., part of the Boundary Waters, a vast landscape of federally protected lakes and forests along the border with Canada, April 18, 2019. The Trump administration has worked at a high level to remove roadblocks to major copper mine which Antofagasta, the Chilean mining giant, wants to build here. (TIM GRUBER/The New York Times)

Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.

•••

The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness is unique. It is the most-visited wilderness area in the nation and our only lakeland wilderness. In January 2023, then-U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland took action to protect the Boundary Waters watershed from the devastation and pollution that inevitably accompany copper mining. Her Public Land Order 7917 bans copper mining exploration and development on federal lands in the headwaters of the wilderness until 2043, the maximum 20-year period allowed.

The order states its objective is to protect the “social and natural resources, ecological integrity, and wilderness values in the Rainy River Watershed, the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness … and the 1854 Ceded Territory of the Chippewa Bands in northeastern Minnesota … .” Consequently, the order also protects wilderness-edge communities that depend on the Boundary Waters for jobs and income.

Sadly, the pillagers of our public lands are relentless. President Donald Trump’s agriculture secretary tweeted in June that she was initiating the process to overturn the 20-year mining ban in the wilderness watershed. On July 31, the deputy interior secretary tweeted a baseless reinterpretation of law intended to pave the way for mining leases for Antofagasta’s Twin Metals, a pet project of Chilean billionaires. U.S. Rep. Pete Stauber, R-Minn., introduced a bill in Congress that would grant 20-year mining leases to Antofagasta with mandatory renewals for an additional 50 years. Those leases would lie within the area where mining is currently banned and on some of the most popular recreational lands in the Superior National Forest.

The straight-faced assertion of mining companies that Minnesota’s tough environmental laws will protect our land, air, water and people is blatant dissembling. Right now, taconite mines are polluting the Boundary Waters. Analysis of chemicals in lakes and rivers in the wilderness watershed shows that pollution from the Peter Mitchell mine and the now-closed Dunka mine are degrading water quality and that the pollution is flowing into the Boundary Waters. This water quality data was collected with state-of-the-art methods and is housed in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency database.

A Twin Metals copper mine would be miles closer to the Boundary Waters than those taconite mines. It would be a more dangerous polluter by orders of magnitude because the ore is sulfide-bearing. The resulting acid mine drainage would irreparably harm the wilderness.

A new report titled “Modern Mine Study: Water Quality Performance and Predictions at U.S. Mines Permitted Since 1990” examined eight modern hardrock mines across the United States. All eight mines degraded downstream surface water quality. Seven of the mines polluted groundwater; data was unavailable for the eighth. Notably, at the six mines where a mining company’s predictions could be compared to actual performance, water pollution was significantly worse than forecast. The companies underestimated acid drainage, leaching of heavy metals and the volume of water requiring long-term treatment.

Further, the reality is that mining companies deal with inconvenient environmental standards by seeking to evade them. One such effort is playing out now. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has preliminarily denied the request of U.S. Steel for a variance from Minnesota’s sulfate standard in wastewater discharge permits for the Keetac mine. U.S. Steel’s 2011 discharge permits required compliance by 2019, which U.S. Steel failed to achieve. The MPCA’s proposed renewed permits require compliance by 2030.

At a Sept. 3 hearing on the variance request, a consistent theme was that if the variance was not granted, Keetac would close and all other taconite mines would soon close, devastating the communities that depend on taconite mining. The shameless effort to frighten people ignored Nippon Steel’s commitment to invest $11 billion in U.S. Steel facilities and operations and to not close any mines for 10 years. Further, and most tellingly, the MPCA’s analysis based on financial documents provided by U.S. Steel shows that the company would continue to be profitable while incurring sulfate treatment costs.

Mining companies spread fear among mining-dependent communities, asserting a false choice between jobs and the environment and counting on jobs to win out. Minnesota’s environmental laws cannot be relied upon to protect our state’s priceless and vulnerable Boundary Waters Wilderness.

If we want to protect the Boundary Waters for current and future generations, we must permanently ban copper mining in its watershed.

Becky Rom is national chair of the Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters.

about the writer

about the writer

Becky Rom

More from Commentaries

See More
card image
DOUG MILLS/The New York Times

Attacks on Somali Americans are a cruel distraction.

card image
card image