The drama in New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's office continues regarding allegations that associates of Christie sought to punish the mayor of Fort Lee by ordering the closing of lanes of traffic leading from his borough to the George Washington Bridge.
The situation is certainly an example of government derailed, but it is also a challenge to our view of workplace loyalty. What can we all learn from this ethical train wreck?
We don't know whether or not Christie had established a clear-cut moral compass for his staff. Regardless, it appears as though some of them chose to go rogue.
Establishing and communicating this ethical foundation of any organization is the first step in creating the ethical workplace — followed by a formal code of ethics, conduct and mission statement plus ongoing ethics training. Employees need and deserve a blueprint on what is acceptable workplace behavior and what is not, and this north-star compass must start from the top.
The dark side of loyalty
But for all its virtue, loyalty has a dark side as well. In the past, the concept of workplace loyalty really meant blind loyalty, ergo unconditional, unthinking and unquestioned compliance with your boss' requests.
When a company overemphasizes this kind of blind devotion, we have what FBI whistleblower Coleen Rowley terms "groupthink." The result is a dangerous lack of skepticism and debate, denial of reality and suspension of personal responsibility.
Those raising questions are seen as disloyal, even when they have crucial and perhaps lifesaving concerns. In this culture, you can even naively follow a charismatic leader straight over the cliff. Loyalty gone awry is betrayal at its worst.
Today's employees recognize they are not only accountable for their own actions but accountable also for any misbehavior they may witness. They realize they are at higher risk for suffering legal, personal and professional consequences of their actions, inaction, complicity or silence.