Q: I would like to scan my own photographic prints into digital images, but I'm having trouble finding a scanner (one that's not a flatbed model) that would be suitable for photos rather than documents.
I looked at a Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 but don't know how well it would work with my photos. What do you think?
Thomas Klechak, Jacksonville, Fla.
A: You're looking at the wrong type of scanner for photos. Many of the top-rated photo scanners are flatbed models, in which you lay the picture flat on top of the scanning window. The trouble with upright printers, including the Fujitsu model you mentioned, is that most of them are optimized to automatically feed in and scan paper documents, not printed photos.
What's the difference between a scanner designed for photos and one for documents? It's the sharpness, or resolution, of the resulting image. Document printers such as the Fujitsu model scan at a resolution of 600 dots per inch (a dot being the smallest discrete element of a printed photo). A photo scanner, such as the Epson Perfection V500, has 10 times the resolution, or 6,400 dots per inch. Consumer photo scanners cost from less than $100 to more than $700. Some elaborate models can scan photographic slides or negatives as well as prints.
You can find lists of top-rated photo scanners at tinyurl.com/y63ozya and tinyurl.com/82u57q4.
Q: I recorded an 11-minute, 3.1-gigabyte cooking video using a point-and-shoot camera. While I can watch the video on my computer, I can't e-mail it (file is too large) or upload it to YouTube (takes about seven hours). Any suggestions?
Ken Schik, Maple Grove