Why did Amazon bypass Minneapolis as a finalist for its second headquarters? There is not enough technology talent here to meet the demand within the desired time frame.
A shortage of talent and an inability to scale the technology workforce are factors that knocked out not only Minneapolis but also others in the running. This is a wake-up call for the entire state as well as companies that call Minnesota home.
Cushman & Wakefield's Tech Cities 1.0 Report recognizes the Twin Cities as a region that offers a reasonable cost of living and quality career opportunities, making it attractive for workers with technology skills. Yet these amenities don't seem to be enough to draw the talent companies need today and in the future.
Demand for tech talent continues to rise in the Twin Cities. In the past 15 months, Minnesota has seen a more than 56 percent jump in the number of job postings related to emerging technologies such as Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, machine learning and blockchain.
The Twin Cities trail other cities competing for Amazon's HQ2 project in available technology based on our study of the labor market. Evaluating multiple data sources, we have found that the Atlanta and Dallas talent pools are approximately three to four times the size of the Twin Cities talent pools.
For example, there is a larger talent pool of consultants skilled in Java, .Net and C+ development in Dallas and Atlanta than in Minneapolis. This holds true across the board for skills such as agile coach/scrum masters, DevOps engineers and data/business intelligence architects and analysts.
Cities like Minneapolis that were not selected as finalists for Amazon's HQ2 project should reflect on what they need to do to be more competitive for future expansion opportunities.
Indeed, some of these cities are creating programs to build a digital-ready workforce through training or developing strategies. Others are seeking alternatives to attract tech workers to their city to build larger and deeper talent pools.