A persistent question from those with both a vested and casual interest in the ongoing story of the MIAC booting St. Thomas out of the conference is this: If the conference is going to oust one athletic powerhouse, why stop there?
After all, St. John's has a much richer legacy in football — the college sport with the greatest visibility and most prestige. It wasn't that long ago that the Johnnies dominated the rivalry with the Tommies, winning 12 in a row from 1998-2009. St. John's is also the only MIAC school to win a Division III national title in football — doing it in both 1976 and 2003.
And the MIAC opened itself up to this question by citing "athletic competitive parity in the conference as a primary concern" for kicking the Tommies out of the conference — not enrollment size or some other factor.
It's a good question, and one that becomes even more interesting with the knowledge that St. John's reportedly would have voted against kicking St. Thomas out. Here are some attempts at answering it:
1) In looking at the past six years of MIAC football history, when both St. Thomas and St. John's were very competitive, some interesting things come to light.
I looked specifically at how both programs fared in those six seasons between 2013 and '18 against Augsburg, Hamline, Carleton and St. Olaf — four schools that often finish at or near the bottom of the conference standings, all of whom were reportedly prepared to vote St. Thomas out of the conference if it came to that.
Both St. Thomas and St. John's were a perfect 24-0 against those schools, sweeping them in each of the past six years. But the final margins were considerably different.
St. Thomas won their games by an average score of 63-9; St. John's won theirs by an average score of 44-7. The Tommies exceeded 60 points in 16 of those games — including the much-discussed 97-0 victory over St. Olaf in 2017. St. John's only exceeded 60 points twice.