RandBall: Michael Rand
We're entering Year 5 of the NHL's playoff format that focuses more on divisions than conferences. The Wild entered the weekend with the fifth most points in the West, and in a conventional system that would pair it with No. 4 San Jose in the first round.
Instead, the most likely matchup is Winnipeg-Wild — second vs. third in the Central Division. Minnesota is 1-3 this season against Winnipeg, which could finish with the second-most points in the conference and looks every bit like the most dangerous team in the West ahead of even Nashville and Vegas.
By contrast, the Wild is 2-0 against San Jose. Not only would that be a fairer matchup (and better for the Wild), but it would get the Wild out of (yet another) first-round matchup against a foe from its division. Minnesota hasn't played a team outside the Central Division in the postseason since the format changed.
The theory is that pitting division teams against each other should build rivalries. The more teams face each other, the more the history, drama and bad blood will build. When the playoffs come around, that only intensifies.
It's not bad logic, but it does miss this point: You can't manufacture a rivalry. It has to grow organically. In trying to go with a gimmick, the NHL cuts down on potential playoff opponents and creates first-round matchups that are less than fair.
Sometimes the simple way is the best way. Seed the teams 1-8 according to point totals. It's not that hard.
Michael Rand is the senior digital writer for Star Tribune sports and keeper of the RandBall blog at startribune.com/RandBall.